Showing posts with label collectors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label collectors. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
Breckenridge! This Weekend and Next
March 6-7 and 13-15, 2015
I will be in Breckenridge this weekend to unveil the large sculpture I started in Jackson last September. I will also be demonstrating by starting a new sculpture.
"Magical" is the first large sculpture I've ever done and will be 3-D scanned and available as a limited edition bronze. A very limited limited edition. Pre-cast pricing will be made available to collectors who wish to get a special price on a bronze casting during this weekend and the next.
If I haven't fallen in love with the original too much - I might be persuaded to part with it.
The original has been coated in bronze and copper and I have applied a cold patina and some Swarovski have been added in some fun strategic places and it has been coated with jeweler's grade resin to give added strength. "Magical" is based on a revolving stand too.
It will never be as resilient as a bronze replica - but on the other hand - the opportunity to own an original artwork of this size is a pretty amazing prospect. And I may never think about selling an original sculpture again. So here's your chance...maybe.
Here's a copy of the ad coming out for the show. Hope you can be there!
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Selling Art
Do you know how the BIG gallery market works? Since I will continue to be considered an "emerging artist" for quite some time, perhaps for the rest of my life...this is something Mark and I are still learning.
Today I would like to share with you something I read the other day. It is from a post written by blogger and gallery owner Edward Winkleman. His blog is well worth reading whether you are an artist or a collector. And his gallery? Well. Here is (in part) the write up on their gallery website:
We have participated in art fairs such as The Armory Show, SEVEN, Pulse, ARCO, Art Chicago, NADA, INDEPENDENT, and Moving Image. Gallery artists have exhibited in some of the world’s most important venues and biennials, including the Venice Biennale, the Vienna Kunsthalle, The Art Institute in Chicago, the Getty Center in Los Angeles, the Singapore Biennale, the Sharjah Biennial, and the Whitney Biennial.Impressive, is all I have to say about that.
One of the artists Winkleman Gallery represents is Shane Hope. Here is one of his 3-D printed artworks:
![]() |
Shane Hope "Computronium-Cloud Copyllution" 2013 |
That Primary Gallery DiscussionIf you are experiencing a growth spurt with gallery representation, I hope you find this useful information. I know I did. Hope you are having a great weekend.Of all the negotiations that an artist has with their dealer, few are as treacherous to navigate as the one concerning the "primary gallery" question. The reason it can be trickier than other issues is because each new potential opportunity to work with another gallery can change the entire landscape. If, for example, you have a primary gallery in City X and then a gallery in City Y wants to work with you, whether the City Y gallery is going to be happy to become your "secondary gallery" will depend on how they feel about both the other gallery and that other city.
In general, it's not to any gallery's advantage to be secondary gallery for any of their artists and it's often to their great advantage to be the primary gallery for all their artists. It's to most artists' benefit to have a primary gallery for some situations and not at all for others. Further, a gallery powerful enough to work out primary gallery status for most of their artists is usually one well worth working with.
So what do we mean by "primary gallery" or "secondary gallery" in this context? We've discussed this before, but an email from an artist struggling with these issues suggests we could flesh out the issues a bit more. I've changed some details to protect the artist's anonymity:I recently graduated and I was picked up by a gallery soon after in City Q. I wanted to get some clarification about other galleries working with other galleries. Is this a common thing? I am not familiar with this and I have been asking anyone with answers about this. I am allowed to get representation in another gallery in another state, however, I was told that I needed to tell that other gallery they need to split their half of the commission with my gallery. Ex: from the 50%, one gallery gets 30% and the other gets 20%. This was not told to me at the beginning. One, I do not feel comfortable in this position and I don't think it is my duty to do this as the artist. Two, if my gallery is the one to start the relationship, then they can discuss their terms. I have been told it is a rare situation and rarely works out.Also, are galleries allowed to take a % from every exhibition I participate in? on works that aren't consigned to them? I am a new, young emerging artist and I feel I am being taken advantage of. I feel I am in a situation I don't know how to go about it. If you have any advice/input it would really be helpful.OK, so let's begin with a frank discussion about why a gallery might insist on this. (And, from what is provided here, I would conclude that this artist is NOT being taken advantage of, but is not being communicated with effectively.)
In the gallery system the term "primary gallery" means an artist's main gallery, or #1 in the pecking order. This is the gallery that maintains his/her master archive, does much of the communications promoting their career (i.e., with institutions planning exhibitions), will work to raise the money to produce most of the work in situations where that's part of the artist's practice, and generally resides in a high-profile market, meaning they get the kind of traffic/critical attention for the artist that other galleries in other locations just can't. In return they may stipulate terms for representation by which their investment in building the markets for their artists is returned to them through commission on sales in other galleries. The thinking here includes the notion that the other galleries (usually in smaller cities) can only command the prices for the work by this artist because of the primary gallery's reputation and hard work in building their market.
Such terms of representation vary widely (including percentages, duration, geographical extent, etc.). Even within most galleries, they are highly negotiable (i.e., Artist G, who is internationally renown and sells work in the 6-digit range, may be able to insist on terms that Artist T, who is fresh out of school and still building a market cannot [nor should, IMHO]).
A "secondary gallery" is any other gallery (within certain geographical restrictions usually, but not necessarily) that an artist who has a primary gallery works with too. You can have many, many secondary galleries, but within any geographical area, you have only one primary gallery. Of course, no gallery would volunteer to be a secondary gallery for their artists, but it's often a small price to pay for the prestige and/or income to be had by working with an artist who already has a strong market built up by another dealer.
Personally, I feel the real "victim" (OK, so it's not truly that dramatic usually) in such situations is the secondary gallery dealer, not the artist, who will still make their 50% of any sale. But I do realize that until all the terms are established, it can be highly uncomfortable for any artist wishing to have other galleries in addition to their primary gallery, so I empathize with this artist.
Having said that, however, discussing---in depth---how any gallery you're considering signing up with works with other galleries is Representation 101. All the anxiety expressed by the artist above can be eliminated through a simple conversation before the fact. Questions I suggest you ask if your potential new (potentially primary) gallery doesn't offer such information upfront include:Question 4 is your real tool here to alleviate any frustration/anxiety. Make the galleries duke it out (they will compromise to your benefit usually). Just be aware up front what your first gallery expects before agreeing to representation. The devil truly lurks in the details of this issue. Personalities, grudges, greed...they can all come into play when dealers talk to each other. If you, as the artist, understand the terms up front though, you don't have to suffer through any of that. Nor should you have to. You may need to make some tough decisions at times, but no one can spare you from those, so....
- Will you see yourself as my "primary gallery"? And if so, what does that mean with regards to services you provide and expectations of working with other galleries?
- Do any commissions you expect of secondary galleries expire after a certain period of my working with them?
- Where do these terms apply? Are you my primary gallery only in this city/state/country/continent ?
- How should I discuss this with a gallery in another city that wants to work with me, but doesn't want to pay commission? Should I ask them to talk with you about it?
- Can this be put in writing?
'Til tomorrow -
~Alex
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Insomnia
Hanging out in a hotel is not all that conducive to sleep for me.
I am working on a sculpture at Turpin Gallery this week and I woke up with the thought that the horse I'm working on ...the feet are too big.
I started the design of this sculpture in the studio at home based on the form of it I had imagined, the little maquette I had made in clay after the imagining (so I wouldn't forget) and then settled on the size of the feet...using that as one of the units of measurement for the rest of the work. This required the use of a 4-letter word.
Math.
Yes...the M word...
Yesterday, as I was working on forming the wire armature in our hotel room - before going to the gallery...I got three legs formed (leaving one to demonstrate the starting point in the process) and up to the shoulders and then started thinking about the back of the Subaru Outback we rented....
Specifically the size of the back of the Subaru and about how this sculpture would not fit in there if I kept this thing going at the height at which it was at the moment. I hadn't attached the head yet and already it was at about 4'.
So I shortened it. Scrunching the legs shorter by folding that wire around the area where the feet would be.
There. That was better....
At least so it seemed in wire. But here's that M word again. You see...it's 22" horizontally from the horse's behind to his shoulders. And, that really means - as far as the design goes - imagining things in design curves and golden rectangles as I tend to do (we all do, by the way; the forms that are all around us in nature are design curves in the golden ratio) - that now things are goofed up.
My thought upon waking at 2 was the remembering of looking at the feet of the sculpture before we left the gallery last night.
Too big.
The feet are too big.
What to do?
Well, just make them smaller.
Problem 1.
I don't want to.
Problem 2.
It isn't practical because of the way the armature base is made, where the feet are placed (make them smaller, they're going to be too far away from one another for the design), and...I don't want to.
Problem 3.
How shall I solve this problem? Hmmmm.
I think I know what I will do. We have to be able to get it home so it must fit in the car. So.
Essentially, the way I must see this is NOT that the feet are too big but that the legs are too short. I imagine the lower part of the horse's legs ...the part below his knees in front and part of the upper and lower legs on the horses rear legs...will be foreshortened just for now.
I will not sculpt the knees ...as that would make the whole horse look too totally weird while I'm at the gallery...I will just keep them straight. Yep.
I'll work on the rest of the body and neck and head while at the gallery...then when I'm back home I can add some length to the legs and make the sculpture the true approximately 71.2" high that it really needs to be.
I will let you ponder the math on that one :)
Problem solved.
Ta Da!
I may be back tomorrow with another dilemma.
P.S. A sculpture sold yesterday! Little "Look!"
But why not? He is such a cutie!
I love being present when a sculpture sells because it is so nice to meet my new collectors personally and get to know them a little bit. I love that!
Tomorrow maybe more progress pics!
'Til then...hope you have a fabulous day.
~Alex
Saturday, August 30, 2014
Farm Girl Saturday Morning
![]() |
Mark loading up the flatbed with the equipment we need to make fences |
I'm not complaining. I was up at 5:30 this morning specifically so I could get a package ready for a collector in Indiana. Her Certificate of Authenticity for the sculpture she bought at Sculpture in the Park was long over due. But I wanted to send her other things too. A personal note and some photos of us taken together at the show. Create a nice presentation...it takes time...a rare commodity in my life... but I cherish my collectors - whether I meet them and know them personally or not - as much as they cherish my sculpture.
So, I don't have enough time in my life to devote to the care and attention a real horse would require. As luck would have it, we are surrounded by horses owned by our neighbors and they are happy for me to visit with them any time I wish. Sometimes, if they go out of town, I even get to spend some time taking care of them. I love that.
So, what are the fences for? You may be wondering. We have cows :). Mostly Dexters.
Well. I have to go - farm girl morning - sculpting girl afternoon. That's my day.
Hope your Saturday is productive and fun. Tomorrow is Inspiration Sunday!
'Til tomorrow!
~Alex
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)